# Motion analysis of a device including a disk and two slender bars with a design change for full disk revolution

Mathematical formulations and numerical experiments for the kinematics of an articulated mechanism are presented. The system of connected rigid bodies is configured in three different ways. For the first two configurations (double rocker), the input motion is either a constant counter-clockwise rotation rate for the disk, or a linearly increasing one. A design modification is implemented to allow full disk revolution with a constant and clockwise input rotation (crank-rocker). Angles, velocities and accelerations are computed and analyzed for a quarter revolution of the disk. The results corroborate the inversion of the linking bar sense of rotation in planar motion and its deceleration. This sense of rotation is always clockwise in the modified design. We note that some quantities have instantaneous equal values at particular positions. This fact may preclude a better understanding of the motion if only instantaneous calculations are made. The approach illustrates how applied rigid body mechanics can be used with profit to describe the motion of articulated devices.

# Introduction

The rigid body is an important idealization of moving and interacting parts and beings. The key feature is the fixed distance between two points in the body, since forces cannot cause deformation of its shape

*Fundamentals of Multibody Dynamics*. (2006). Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/b137682

*SIAM Review*,

*42*(1), 3–39. https://doi.org/10.1137/s0036144599360110

*A Unified Framework for Rigid Body Dynamics*. A-4040 Linz - Altenberger Strasse 69.

*Journal of Applied Biomechanics*,

*20*(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.20.1.25

*The International Journal of Robotics Research*,

*8*(5), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/027836498900800502

Here we offer a tool to simulate the motion of an articulated mechanism made with a disk and two slender bars. An input rotation is imposed on the disk, triggering the planar motion of the long intermediate link, and the partial rotation of the short output bar. We develop the kinematics in detail using applied vector algebra, calculus and descriptive geometry. An approach based on differential modeling has been reported in the literature as a simplified alternative based on kinematic Jacobians

*International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education*,

*37*(3), 210–222. https://doi.org/10.7227/ijmee.37.3.5

*International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education*,

*37*(2), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.7227/ijmee.37.2.5

The study of the motion of articulated devices and machines is a classic and well-established subject

*American Journal of Physics*,

*34*(10).

*Journal of Applied Mechanics*,

*37*(3), 697–702.

*Journal of Biomechanics*,

*28*(1), 119–124.

*ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics*,

*22*(4), 299–308.

The outline of the article is as follows. The original mechanism is presented and its two configurations are formulated. Geometrical constraints are introduced, as well as formulations to obtain various velocities and accelerations, paying particular attention to the proper use of Chasles’ theorem. Then the modified design is explained, and a similar sequence of formulations for the geometry, the velocities, and the accelerations is presented. The numerical experiments properly said are then described. Results are presented for each one of the three configurations, where various aspects of the motions are demonstrated. Final remarks are then laid out, summarizing the important results of this investigation. At the end, an appendix with the details of the angular accelerations’ calculations for the original mechanism is given.

# Original mechanism

The analysis is traced back to

## Geometrical constraints

The three angles describing rotation of the articulated mechanism are

Since the length of the linking bar

An overbar means the length of a given straight line segment. It can be inferred from Fig. 1(a) that

A right triangle with

And the adjacent side:

Applying the Pitagorean theorem in Fig. 1(a):

These relations are needed to obtain

## Velocities

With pin

Where

Taking the time derivative of

And

With pin

Where

Where

The fixed vectors in the rigid bodies going from

Solving the vector algebra of Eq. (14) using Eqs. (15) – (19):

and

Where

Having obtained

## Accelerations

Here we need to distinguish between the constant and the variable

### Constant input rotation rate

Taking the derivative of Eq. (14) with respect to time:

The linear accelerations

Substituting back into Eq. (23) and working the vector algebra, we obtain expressions for angular accelerations of bars

### Variable input rotation rate

Since the disk now has a variable rate of rotation

Referring back to Fig. 1(b), the tangential component can be written as:

The radial component is still given by Eq. (24). Following a similar procedure as for the constant case, angular accelerations for bars

And,

# Modified mechanism

A design modification of the original mechanism is shown in Fig. 2. The distance between fixed centers O and C is made shorter than the original to allow full revolution of the disk while keeping the size of the linking bar AB unchanged. The full revolution is not possible in the original mechanism in Fig. 1.

*International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education*,

*34*(4), 201–214.

*International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education*,

*31*(3), 349–363.

## Geometrical constraints

Trigonometric functions follow the same short-hand notation described earlier. The relation between horizontal displacements for pins A and B are now given by:

Simplifying :

A right triangle with AB as the hypotenuse gives:

## Velocities

An intermediate position will have a velocity vector for pin A with negative

The fixed vectors in the rigid bodies from O to A (

Similarly to what was done earlier, we find

and

Where

## Accelerations

The linear accelerations

Substituting back into Eq. (23) and working the vector algebra:

Tables 1 and 2 present a summary of all acceleration terms for the three configurations of the articulated mechanism. The reader is referred to the appendix for a derivation of these terms. These equations have been implemented numerically

*Anais do XLII Congresso Brasileiro de Educação em Engenharia*. Retrieved from http://198.136.59.239/ abengeorg/cobenge-2014/Artigos/128970.pdf

# Numerical experiments

## Original mechanism: constant angular velocity

In figure 3 we plot angles, velocities and accelerations for a

In Table 3, cells with an asterisk highlight the same numerical values. For example, the calculated value for

## Original mechanism: variable angular velocity

The results for the original mechanism with an increasing rotation rate for the disk are presented in Fig. 4. Since the mechanism’s geometry is the same, the change in sense of rotation for the linking bar still takes place at

## Modified mechanism

Results for the modified design are shown in Fig. 5. In this scenario there is no change in rotation direction for linking bar AB. This can be seen in the top right panel, where

The motion of the modified mechanism has one peculiarity not present in the previous two cases. At the end of the

# Discussion and conclusions

The relations needed to simulate the motion of a two-dimensional device were presented and the kinematics of three variants of this device were analyzed through a

Results of the simulation runs were presented using line plots for the variables of interest as functions of the disk’s turn angle

Despite the complexities of the rigid bodies’ formulations described here, one should keep in mind that this is still a relatively simple mechanics problem. All principles applied are exact and the numerical implementations only required algebraic expressions. Complications arise if one attempts to formulate and model collisions between rigid bodies. Impulse-momentum principles are needed compared to the limited kinematics toolbox used in this investigaton (

*SIAM Review*,

*42*(1), 3–39. https://doi.org/10.1137/s0036144599360110

*A Unified Framework for Rigid Body Dynamics*. A-4040 Linz - Altenberger Strasse 69.

This work was motivated by the desire to introduce project-based activities in the undergraduate engineering mechanics’ classroom. Without showing how the motion of articulated mechanisms is obtained, one may not appreciate the intricacies of the kinematics of rigid bodies in key applications such as video-game physics engines, and the design of prosthetic limbs or robotic devices.

# Appendix: Derivation of angular acceleration terms

Details of the procedure to obtain the angular acceleration terms for the original mechanism are shown below. Similar procedures apply for the other two configurations. We start by substituting Eqs. (24) through (26) into Eq. (23):

Using Eqs. (19) for

Now we separate Eq. (64) into its

Multiplying the

Solving Eq. (66) for

Eq. (67) can be compared to Eq. (29) to identify terms

Finally, solving it for

And Eq. (69) can be compared to Eq. (32) to identify terms

### Citations:

**No Citations**

This pub does not have any citations to list.

## Discussions

**Devin Berg:**Dr. Fleischfresser,After a review of your revised document submitted in response to the reviewers comments, we have decided to accept your article for publication in the Journal of Open Engineering...

**Devin Berg:**Dr. Fleischfresser, Thank you for your submission to the Journal of Open Engineering. Please consider the two reviews that have been completed. In particular, there are three main points that I'd ...

**Luciano Fleischfresser:**1. The main thrust is the numerical evaluation of the kinematic equations and its reproducibility. The interest to develop this work originated from my daily routine of teaching vector mechanics to...

**Devin Berg:**Thank your for your response. Could you perhaps address the first item in your introduction. Incorporating the argument of your response here should be sufficient.

**Juliano Iossaqui:**REVIEW FOR THE JOURNAL OF OPEN ENGINEERING The manuscript presents an kinematics analysis of a mechanism denoted by two slender bars with a design revolution. This mechanism is a typical four-bar ...

**Luciano Fleischfresser:**Regarding the typos, this is a LaTeX/Markdown rendering issue. I am still not able to fix them. The use of generalized coordinates for this problem is beyond my technical knowledge. The suggestio...

**Luciano Fleischfresser:**Corrected link: https://nuvem.utfpr.edu.br/index.php/s/CMUBxzy8fE3yMt2

**Jason Moore:**REVIEW FOR THE JOURNAL OF OPEN ENGINEERING In this paper the author derives the kinematic equations governing the four bar linkage, a common dynamics benchmark problem. The author then compares di...

**Jason Moore:**One additional comment. It is not acceptable to use copyrighted figures from a textbook in this venue.

**Luciano Fleischfresser:**REGARDING INITIAL COMMENTS: One of the main goals is to present a design modification to the original case, and, to this author's knowledge, this modification has not been presented before. The 2...